Join Our Mailing List
Email:
For Email Marketing you can trust

(IPS) ALEC-Backed Laws Promote Controversial Charter Schools

This article first appeared on the Inter-Press Service website at: http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/02/alec-backed-laws-promote-controversial-charter-schools/

 

ATLANTA, Georgia, Feb 27 2013 (IPS) - The right-wing American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and private education management firms are pushing for new “parent trigger” laws in states across the U.S. by lobbying many Republican and some Democratic legislators to make it easier to convert more traditional public schools to charter schools.
Charter schools are a fairly new phenomenon in the U.S., with the first charter schools opening in the 1990s. The founders of a charter school are able to create a charter that defines the purpose and mission of the school, which does not have to necessarily follow the purpose and mission of a traditional public school.
Charter schools are considered public schools and typically receive some public funds. However, at the same time, they have a private charter and are not part of the public school system.
You can have the red apple or you can have the green apple, and both of them are sour.
“The choice for parents is, are you going to trust a corporation where the CEO and the board are unaccountable, or are you going to trust the government?” said Kim Kahwach, an Atlanta parent who took an active role when the city’s public school system faced a recent accreditation crisis, and said she has concerns about the parent trigger proposal.
“Those are the choices that are being put in front of you. You go charter or you go government. You can have the red apple or you can have the green apple, and both of them are sour,” Kahwach told IPS.
In a traditional school, parents can voice their concerns to their school board members, who have some influence to potentially address their concerns. This is not always the case with charter schools.
“Some charter schools give parents a greater role, many do not. They let the parents work there or raise money,” said John Rogers, an associate professor at the University of California-Los Angeles’s (UCLA) Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.
“That’s different than acting as civic agents to shape that school,” he told IPS. “There’s no promise that they will (engage parents).”
Charter schools are the latest scheme to privatise public education in the U.S., and are seen as more politically feasible than “voucher” proposals that would give students vouchers to purchase private schooling.
Related IPS Articles
New Yorkers Rage Against the Cuts
Targeting Right-Wing Extremism, Citizens Challenge Corporate Ties
Many charter schools are operated by for-profit educational management firms, which receive sometimes lucrative contracts to operate the schools.
Critics note that one consequence of this is to shift teachers and other school employees away from being public sector, unionised workers who receive decent pay and benefits and who have some job protections, to being private, non-unionised workers who may not receive the same pay, benefits, and protections.
In recent years there has been increasing conversion of U.S. public schools to charter schools, as new charter schools have opened and traditional public schools have closed.
For example, Atlanta recently closed several public schools due to under-enrollment of students. However, the decrease in the student population of those schools was caused largely by the transfer of many students to new, nearby charter schools.
After Hurricane Katrina, pro-charter school advocates capitalised on the crisis to convert most of the schools in the Orleans Parish School System to charter schools.
The parent trigger legislation being pushed by ALEC and other pro-charter lobbyists creates a petition process, whereby a majority of dissatisfied parents at a school could force the school to take one of several actions. Often the preferred action is to convert to a charter school to be managed by a private company.
Another type of legislation being pushed by ALEC is to create a statewide charter school commission that could override the decisions of local school boards. Such a commission has been established in Georgia.
As of June 2012, seven U.S. states had enacted parent trigger legislation, beginning with California in 2010, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The other six states are Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio, and Texas.
In California, a group called Parent Revolution was founded with more than one million dollars from foundations like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Walton Family Foundation to push for the parent trigger law.
“An integral part of improving education in Georgia is greater parent buy-in to their children’s education. The parent trigger proposal will assist parents with this,” State Rep. Ed Lindsey, a Republican from Atlanta, said in a statement.
According to Rogers, however, Parent Revolution has not been so revolutionary.
“The approach taken by Parent Revolution has been to send in paid organisers to local communities to try to gather parent petitions. Once the trigger is pulled so to speak – that is an unfortunate metaphor, I would add – and the traditional public school changes over to a charter school, parents arguably have less power than they did before,” Rogers told IPS.
That is because once the school system enters into a contract with the charter school, the school system – and the parents and students – are bound to the terms of the charter.
Rogers argues that Parent Revolution mobilises, but does not organise, parents. An organising approach would build capacity among parents and build relationships between parents, “versus a one-time single shot effort that tries to get signatures and is going to be on to the next campaign.”
Parents are often frustrated about the lack of quality of their child’s education, especially if their school does not receive enough support from local property taxes. However, converting the school to a charter school does not address the resource issue.
As a whole, charter schools perform little or no better than traditional public schools in terms of educating students, test scores and other data show.
In addition, charter schools often further segregation. A 2009 study by the UCLA Civil Rights Project showed that “charter schools are more racially isolated than traditional public schools in virtually every state and large metropolitan area in the nation.”
“Across the board, in many cases, charter schools are doing worse than some schools,” Kahwach said. “In some cases, they are better. It’s not such an overwhelming choice to jump ship over. You don’t have control over how the charter school spends its money – they are a business.
“People need to take a stand and make their schools what they want them to be,” she said.

ATLANTA, Georgia, Feb 27 2013 (IPS) - The right-wing American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) and private education management firms are pushing for new “parent trigger” laws in states across the U.S. by lobbying many Republican and some Democratic legislators to make it easier to convert more traditional public schools to charter schools.

Charter schools are a fairly new phenomenon in the U.S., with the first charter schools opening in the 1990s. The founders of a charter school are able to create a charter that defines the purpose and mission of the school, which does not have to necessarily follow the purpose and mission of a traditional public school.

Charter schools are considered public schools and typically receive some public funds. However, at the same time, they have a private charter and are not part of the public school system.

“The choice for parents is, are you going to trust a corporation where the CEO and the board are unaccountable, or are you going to trust the government?” said Kim Kahwach, an Atlanta parent who took an active role when the city’s public school system faced a recent accreditation crisis, and said she has concerns about the parent trigger proposal.

“Those are the choices that are being put in front of you. You go charter or you go government. You can have the red apple or you can have the green apple, and both of them are sour,” Kahwach told IPS.

In a traditional school, parents can voice their concerns to their school board members, who have some influence to potentially address their concerns. This is not always the case with charter schools.

“Some charter schools give parents a greater role, many do not. They let the parents work there or raise money,” said John Rogers, an associate professor at the University of California-Los Angeles’s (UCLA) Graduate School of Education and Information Studies.

“That’s different than acting as civic agents to shape that school,” he told IPS. “There’s no promise that they will (engage parents).”

Charter schools are the latest scheme to privatise public education in the U.S., and are seen as more politically feasible than “voucher” proposals that would give students vouchers to purchase private schooling.

Many charter schools are operated by for-profit educational management firms, which receive sometimes lucrative contracts to operate the schools.

Critics note that one consequence of this is to shift teachers and other school employees away from being public sector, unionised workers who receive decent pay and benefits and who have some job protections, to being private, non-unionised workers who may not receive the same pay, benefits, and protections.

In recent years there has been increasing conversion of U.S. public schools to charter schools, as new charter schools have opened and traditional public schools have closed.

For example, Atlanta recently closed several public schools due to under-enrollment of students.

However, the decrease in the student population of those schools was caused largely by the transfer of many students to new, nearby charter schools.

After Hurricane Katrina, pro-charter school advocates capitalised on the crisis to convert most of the schools in the Orleans Parish School System to charter schools.

The parent trigger legislation being pushed by ALEC and other pro-charter lobbyists creates a petition process, whereby a majority of dissatisfied parents at a school could force the school to take one of several actions. Often the preferred action is to convert to a charter school to be managed by a private company.

Another type of legislation being pushed by ALEC is to create a statewide charter school commission that could override the decisions of local school boards. Such a commission has been established in Georgia.

As of June 2012, seven U.S. states had enacted parent trigger legislation, beginning with California in 2010, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The other six states are Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Ohio, and Texas.

In California, a group called Parent Revolution was founded with more than one million dollars from foundations like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Walton Family Foundation to push for the parent trigger law.

“An integral part of improving education in Georgia is greater parent buy-in to their children’s education. The parent trigger proposal will assist parents with this,” State Rep. Ed Lindsey, a Republican from Atlanta, said in a statement.

According to Rogers, however, Parent Revolution has not been so revolutionary.

“The approach taken by Parent Revolution has been to send in paid organisers to local communities to try to gather parent petitions. Once the trigger is pulled so to speak – that is an unfortunate metaphor, I would add – and the traditional public school changes over to a charter school, parents arguably have less power than they did before,” Rogers told IPS.

That is because once the school system enters into a contract with the charter school, the school system – and the parents and students – are bound to the terms of the charter.

Rogers argues that Parent Revolution mobilises, but does not organise, parents. An organising approach would build capacity among parents and build relationships between parents, “versus a one-time single shot effort that tries to get signatures and is going to be on to the next campaign.”

Parents are often frustrated about the lack of quality of their child’s education, especially if their school does not receive enough support from local property taxes. However, converting the school to a charter school does not address the resource issue.

As a whole, charter schools perform little or no better than traditional public schools in terms of educating students, test scores and other data show.

In addition, charter schools often further segregation. A 2009 study by the UCLA Civil Rights Project showed that “charter schools are more racially isolated than traditional public schools in virtually every state and large metropolitan area in the nation.”

“Across the board, in many cases, charter schools are doing worse than some schools,” Kahwach said.

“In some cases, they are better. It’s not such an overwhelming choice to jump ship over. You don’t have control over how the charter school spends its money – they are a business.

“People need to take a stand and make their schools what they want them to be,” she said.

(END/2013)

 


Comments (2)

huh?
Said this on 3-4-2013 At 11:42 am

I don't have a strong feeling one way or another, but the following quotes from the story do not give me much info to think about making the choice:

"As a whole, charter schools perform little or no better than traditional public schools in terms of educating students, test scores and other data show."

So, does "no better" mean worse, then?  Or the same?  Does "as a whole" mean they are compared on average?  If so, shouldn't you be able to figure out if they are better (either a 'little' or not at all)? 

“Across the board, in many cases, charter schools are doing worse than some schools,” Kahwach said.

This is one of the most hedged, meaningless assertions I have read in a while.  It is one conditional term after another, with the strange exception of "across the board".  Is it across the board or in many cases?  And isn't it unfair to compare charter schools overall to "some schools"?  I would think even if charter schools are overall a good idea, some public schools are very good and would be better than (even most) charter schools.  

How about a link to some actual studies, rather than these bald, meaningless assertions?  This article actually made me change my mind and think charter schools might be better than I thought, due to the words used.  The public schools boosters need to get a better spokesperson...

Said this on 4-29-2013 At 06:03 am

its very useful site because each and every information belongs to education available in your site.it's useful for every student.i have seen your rss code it is very good and one of my friend Mr Rajiv suggest to visit your site.

 

<a href="http://www.igjse.com/">Latestgovt jobs, notifications,jobs</a>

Post a Comment
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
(not publicly displayed)
Reply Notification:
Website:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image:
* Message:

Please use this form to contact us
Your Name:
Your Email:
Subject:
Question/Comment:

Email to Friend

Fill in the form below to send this news item to a friend:

Email to Friend
* Your Name:
* Your Email:
* Friend's Name:
* Friend's Email:
* Security Image:
Security Image Generate new
Copy the numbers and letters from the security image
* Message: